Consider: <p:for-each> <p:identity name="first"/> <p:identity name="second"/> </p:for-each> The description of p:for-each says: The environment inherited by the contained steps of a p:for-each is the inherited environment with these modifications: * The port named “current” on the p:for-each is added to the readable ports. * The port named “current” on the p:for-each is made the default readable port. In the case of the identity step named "first", this clearly has the desired consequence: first reads the current port of the loop. In the case of the identity step named "second", to what is the "source" port bound? I think our spec currently says that it's bound to the current port of the loop, but I'm not sure that's what we want. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Language is by its very nature a http://nwalsh.com/ | communal thing; that is, it expresses | never the exact thing but a | compromise--that which is common to | you, me, and everybody.--T. E. HulmeReceived on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 11:27:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 October 2008 11:27:27 GMT