W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2008

RE: CR draft ready for review

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:50:41 -0500
Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC7870D721C5E@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

> "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> > == Slight clarification ==
> >> >
> >> > "it is a static error if the signature of a known step 
> in the version
> >> > library has changed, except for new options."
> >> >
> >> > You should add "that are not using syntatic shortcut form"
> >>
> >> How do syntactic shortcut forms come into play? This 
> section is about
> >> the declarations, not their use.
> >
> > Well ! not stricly speaking the following which says :
> >
> > "New options on known steps are ignored in the pipeline."
> >
> > Which could lead to the fact that new options (even in 
> shortcut form) are
> > ignored in the pipeline
> >
> > Which seems odd with respect to err:XS0008
> >
> > ""It is a static error if any element in the XProc 
> namespace has attributes
> > not defined by this specification unless they are extension 
> attributes.""
> 
> If you load the "2.0" XProc library and it adds a new "randomize" 
> option to p:namespace-rename, then the randomize option is allowed on
> p:namespace-rename steps, either in p:option form or as a syntactic
> shortcut.
> 
> That declaration defines it. And our spec says that, so by extension
> our spec defines it.
> 

I agree. I don't think there is a problem with err:XS0008 here.

Regards,
Vojtech
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 07:51:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 November 2008 07:51:30 GMT