W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CR draft ready for review

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:29:28 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2d4guors7.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes:

>> > == Slight clarification ==
>> >
>> > "it is a static error if the signature of a known step in the version
>> > library has changed, except for new options."
>> >
>> > You should add "that are not using syntatic shortcut form"
>> How do syntactic shortcut forms come into play? This section is about
>> the declarations, not their use.
> Well ! not stricly speaking the following which says :
> "New options on known steps are ignored in the pipeline."
> Which could lead to the fact that new options (even in shortcut form) are
> ignored in the pipeline
> Which seems odd with respect to err:XS0008
> ""It is a static error if any element in the XProc namespace has attributes
> not defined by this specification unless they are extension attributes.""

If you load the "2.0" XProc library and it adds a new "randomize" 
option to p:namespace-rename, then the randomize option is allowed on
p:namespace-rename steps, either in p:option form or as a syntactic

That declaration defines it. And our spec says that, so by extension
our spec defines it.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The people who live in a Golden Age
http://nwalsh.com/            | usually go around complaining how
                              | yellow everything looks.--Randall
                              | Jarrell

Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 23:30:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:46 UTC