W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Remove c:errors

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:43:25 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0805200843m252d12ffk8c0b7c912bba6ffb@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

Yep

If c:errorS in the same c:errors are linked to each other because are
generated by the same process



On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> / "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | Can we have best of both world as we already do with c:param :
> |
> | Letīs say we have a sequence of c:errors
>
> I suppose we could, but is there any significant benefit in allowing
> a sequence of c:errors over just a sequence of c:error?
>
>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A new scientific truth does not triumph
> http://nwalsh.com/            | by convincing its opponents and making
>                              | them see the light, but rather because
>                              | its opponents eventually die, and a new
>                              | generation grows up that is familiar
>                              | with it (Planck 1949)
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 15:44:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 20 May 2008 15:44:04 GMT