W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: p:schema-import

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 18:14:01 +0100
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <30E2D047-CCD1-4F44-B4B1-148C0B8DEA60@jenitennison.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>

On 19 May 2008, at 16:59, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
> | Seriously, we could say that for XProc v1, even if you're using  
> XPath
> | 2.0, the in-scope schema definitions are all empty.
> Or implementation-defined?

I guess. Is it going to be possible implementations to do their own  
version of <p:import-schema> as an extension?

Actually, we can't go all the way and say there are no in-scope schema  
definitions, because of course we do want to support dates and things  
like that, so in fact I meant "no in-scope schema definitions aside  
from the predefined schema types".

Jeni Tennison
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 17:14:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:46 UTC