Re: p:schema-import

On 19 May 2008, at 16:59, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
> | Seriously, we could say that for XProc v1, even if you're using  
> XPath
> | 2.0, the in-scope schema definitions are all empty.
>
> Or implementation-defined?


I guess. Is it going to be possible implementations to do their own  
version of <p:import-schema> as an extension?

Actually, we can't go all the way and say there are no in-scope schema  
definitions, because of course we do want to support dates and things  
like that, so in fact I meant "no in-scope schema definitions aside  
from the predefined schema types".

Jeni
-- 
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com