W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Should p:variable be allowed in p:library?

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 15:07:01 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0805070607q2c6a45demaca3c1c6bcb7208e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
I would say NO, because it will be conflicting we the fact that from inside
a p:declare-step, we don't see what is at the same or upper level

Mohamed

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

> / "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | Where in p:library, as a direct child ?
>
> Yes. Before the contained declare-step/pipeline children.
>
>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Look for the ridiculous in everything
> http://nwalsh.com/            | and you will find it.--Jules Renard
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 13:07:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 May 2008 13:07:39 GMT