W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Variable and option binding proposal

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:06:42 +0000
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5biqz88av1.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> |> Why no mention of options in 2.5?
> |
> | Because there are no option bindings at the beginning of any
> | containers any more.
>
> There are in pipelines!

Ah, yes, I meant to say something in p:declare-step about this,
_that's_ what I forgot :-(

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH67gCkjnJixAXWBoRAhPxAJ9cGxK6arIYodyJ6LzsRaY6yfCgTQCfT8mU
/pGdX7dARgndWdFuF7RdGYU=
=+Fok
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:07:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:07:28 GMT