- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:40:34 +0000
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Murray Maloney writes:
> I think that I want to read a title that contains the words
> "Extension" and "Step(s)".
> I think that I want a paragraph to explain how one approaches
> extending xproc, whether sanctioned or not, and what the
> implications of that are on both processor development and pipeline
> development -- design your pipeline with your processor in mind,
> design your processor with your documents in mind, or design your
> pipelines for lowest common denominator. We have to address this.
I think that's a good idea, thank you.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH4k0ykjnJixAXWBoRApVYAJ9bBjgMLFY2Y8Ha1z1a76UPsMstvwCZAZ+F
cEF0jjs1SaraqoWFpNH+lME=
=EUi+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2008 11:41:45 UTC