W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:40:34 +0000
To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bk5jxmxn1.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Murray Maloney writes:

> I think that I want to read a title that contains the words
> "Extension" and "Step(s)".

> I think that I want a paragraph to explain how one approaches
> extending xproc, whether sanctioned or not, and what the
> implications of that are on both processor development and pipeline
> development -- design your pipeline with your processor in mind,
> design your processor with your documents in mind, or design your
> pipelines for lowest common denominator. We have to address this.

I think that's a good idea, thank you.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH4k0ykjnJixAXWBoRApVYAJ9bBjgMLFY2Y8Ha1z1a76UPsMstvwCZAZ+F
cEF0jjs1SaraqoWFpNH+lME=
=EUi+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2008 11:41:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 March 2008 11:41:46 GMT