Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [first set of comments]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> Ok. I'm willing to float the idea that only steps (atomic, compound,
> or multi-container) have names.

Actually, I'm happy with the auto-naming applying to p:when etc., just
as long as they're not called steps.

> Then we get to p:group and I start to think that maybe we should just
> say to heck with it and have p:trycatch/p:try/p:catch.

I don't think that's necessary, but maybe it is simpler. . .

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH3+Z3kjnJixAXWBoRAsyfAJ9LaTz7nEjfdL3k3c0idaGM7YTx1wCeO7j0
AcdapT7DHEXqE619w9ui0P8=
=HXpe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----