W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: (atomic/compound) steps, containers and related issues

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:35:19 +0000
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5btzj4rtg8.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> I think I finessed this by defining "container" and "contained steps"
> such that the intervening non-step wrappers are transparent. That is,
> the container for a px:foo inside a p:for-each is the p:for-each; the
> container for a px:bar inside a p:when is the p:choose above the
> p:when.

Where?  The definitions of _contained step_ and _container_ are
expressed in terms of immediate containment. . .

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH39MnkjnJixAXWBoRAk5VAJ4oXaWloJQMsyIHsznO1zzWxfdJXACggpJa
PYSVPrCF4ioL/0ikkJs/4/U=
=VSdN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:35:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:35:57 GMT