Re: Standard error codes - QNames or not?

Vojtech,

err:XD0003 is a *dynamic* error, so it is allowed

I thought you were speaking of *static* error

Mohamed

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:02 AM, <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> wrote:

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On
> > Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:48 PM
> > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Standard error codes - QNames or not?
> >
> >
> > | Related to this, can p:error be used for generating standard XProc
> > | errors (such as err:XS0001)?
> >
> > I'm of two minds. I could see forbidding them on principle, on the
> > other hand, I don't see a lot of danger allowing them.
> >
>
> If we allow it, it would make it possible to "rethrow" the standard
> errors in the catch block, for instance, which may be a useful feature:
>
> <p:try>
>  <p:group>
>    ...
>  </p:group>
>  <p:catch>
>    <p:choose>
>      <p:when test="... check for err:XD0003 ...">
>        <!-- rethrow err:XD0003 -->
>        <p:error code="err:XD0003">
>          ...
>        </p:error>
>      </p:when>
>      <p:otherwise>
>        <!-- do something else -->
>      </p:otherwise>
>    </p:choose>
>  </p:catch>
> </p:try>
>
>
> Regards
> Vojtech
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €