W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Review of section 2.6

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:52:42 +0100
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bfxpy5gfp.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I took an action to review this some time ago.

1) wrt the Processor XPath Context, 2.6.1.1 says in-scope namespaces
   are the namespaces in scope on the surrounding element, but 2.6.2.1
   says the statically known namespaces are the namespaces in scope on
   the surrounding element plus those from p:namespaces.  Why the
   difference?

   Similarly, there is much more detail in 2.6.1.2 wrt in-scope
   namespaces than there is in 2.6.2.2 about statically known
   namespaces. . .

2) "they're in-scope" --> "their in-scope"

Otherwise, looks good to me.

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIib6KkjnJixAXWBoRAjVNAJ9YodDgKwaLK0NrEqPVcDrolMNqxgCfRED0
p7e3LanJPTXbQWel8esAVLQ=
=z70K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 11:53:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 July 2008 11:53:19 GMT