W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Naming of p:declare-step

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:56:06 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m263wrely1.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
| So let's rename <p:declare-step> as p:step or p:step-type or
| p:step-kind -- the important thing is what we're declaring, not the
| fact that we're declaring it.

There is something awfully clunky about p:declare-step. Now that
we've been using <qname> to identify steps in a pipeline (instead
of our early <p:step type="qname">), I think renaming p:declare-step
to p:step might work.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | All of us are creatures of a day; the
http://nwalsh.com/            | rememberer and the remembered
                              | alike.--Marcus Aurelius

Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:56:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:56:20 GMT