W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2008

RE: Excluding prefix on p:inline (was Re: XProc Minutes 31 Jan 2008)

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:43:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020A5067FC@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On 
> Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Tuesday, 2008 February 05 9:39
> To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Excluding prefix on p:inline (was Re: XProc Minutes 
> 31 Jan 2008)
> 
> / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
> | Although we could punt to extension steps that others write,
> | namespaces cause such problems generally, I think we should make
> | namespace handling as straight-forward as possible.
> 
> Could we punt to XML 1.1? You can just undeclare them in XML 1.1.

Do you mean Namespaces 1.1?

paul
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:47:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:47:33 GMT