W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2008

RE: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:46:04 -0400
Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC7870C187209@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

> Yes. For generating c:param elements, the @name (is an NCName) +
> @namespace route is definitely the easiest. (We mandate it in
> p:parameters.)
> (I don't think, though maybe I was confused, that there was 
> ever any motion to remove that option.)

No no, I was just asked to come up with a use case where not having
@namespace would cause problems.
> *All* I was suggesting was that this:
>   <c:param-set xmlns:x="http://my/xslt/parameter/namespace">
>      <c:param name="x:foo" value="1" 
> namespace="http:/something/else"/>
>   </c:param-set>
> should be an error.

I agree with this. We can say that it is an error if @namespace is
present and it specifies a different namespace.

Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 14:48:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:46 UTC