RE: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace

• From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
• Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 03:41:27 -0400
• To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC7870C03A1C7@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>

> Yes, that was what I proposed when replying to Norm's initial 
> e-mail. But I am not sure now whether c:param  

...should be *c:param/@name*

> should always be a NCName, or whether we should say that it must
> be a NCName if @namespace is provided, otherwise it can be a 
> QName... (I don't think the latter would be too nice, though.)
> 
> Vojtech

Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 07:42:12 UTC