RE: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace

> Yes, that was what I proposed when replying to Norm's initial 
> e-mail. But I am not sure now whether c:param  

...should be *c:param/@name*

> should always be a NCName, or whether we should say that it must
> be a NCName if @namespace is provided, otherwise it can be a 
> QName... (I don't think the latter would be too nice, though.)
> 
> Vojtech