W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Exclude prefixes on p:inline

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:53:44 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bprsekv5j.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> Sorry, Henry; I'm confused. Your citation is to my message, but the
> quotation is from Jeni's. Are you agreeing with Jeni that we should
> allow it higher up, or with me that we should rename it
> 'exclude-inline-prefixes', or both?

The latter (exclude-inline-prefixes).

I'm agnostic, tending slightly to conservative (i.e., not at all, or
at most only allow on the obvious top-level elts, not everywhere) wrt
Jeni's suggestion, since the pipeline namespace is always excluded
anyway.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIEcZIkjnJixAXWBoRAtHYAJ4/EV1I3uQiA1UN76/0x85M9JA4rACfVvOs
cKVadv5hS47tUJiyMsuO57Y=
=Chuj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 11:54:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 April 2008 11:54:19 GMT