W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: p:declare-step | p:import in p:declare-step

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:41:09 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2od7ztloq.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| This has an impact on the order of elements no ?

Yes. It divides the children of p:pipeline or p:declare-step into
three groups: signature stuff, imports and declares, and subpipeline.
I have mixed feelings about that, but at the moment it looks like the
best alternative.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Between the ages of twenty and forty we
http://nwalsh.com/            | are engaged in the process of
                              | discovering who we are, which involves
                              | learning the difference between
                              | accidental limitations which it is our
                              | duty to outgrow and the necessary
                              | limitations of our nature beyond which
                              | we cannot trespass with impunity.--W.
                              | H. Auden

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2008 13:41:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:45 UTC