W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: empty document node or undefined

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:43:42 -0700
Message-ID: <47F41A2E.3050309@orbeon.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> For after the next draft, I think we should consider the cases where
>  we say that the context node is an empty document node. If XPath 2.0
>  is being used, I think we should probably say the context node is
>  undefined instead. But keep it an empty document node for XPath 1.0.

Or an empty sequence for XPath 2.0?

Alex
-- 
Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise
Orbeon's Blog: http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Personal Blog: http://avernet.blogspot.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 23:44:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 April 2008 23:45:00 GMT