- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:43:42 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > For after the next draft, I think we should consider the cases where > we say that the context node is an empty document node. If XPath 2.0 > is being used, I think we should probably say the context node is > undefined instead. But keep it an empty document node for XPath 1.0. Or an empty sequence for XPath 2.0? Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise Orbeon's Blog: http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ Personal Blog: http://avernet.blogspot.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 23:44:59 UTC