W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

<input> for <pipeline>

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:47:36 +0100 (BST)
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070921144736.E20AC264C6B@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Section 5.1: "On a p:pipeline, [p:input] is both a declaration and a binding."

What bindings make sense for a pipeline input?  p:pipe doesn't, because
there's nothing to connect it to.  The others don't seem of much use:
why have the input at all if the user can't connect to it?

-- Richard
Received on Friday, 21 September 2007 14:47:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT