W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Towards a consensus draft (urgent)

From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:18:44 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20070910181544.05790990@mail.muzmo.com>
To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

At 01:14 PM 9/10/2007 -0700, Alex Milowski wrote:
>On 9/10/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't believe there was working group consensus to require that all
> > steps produce only fixed up documents. I think it would be better if
> > there had been, but there wasn't.
>
>Obviously, I agree.  Anyone else?

I agree.

Although, if pressed, I might say that top-level steps had to produce
WF and namespace-fixed documents. This might allow nested steps
to mess things up so long as the outer step's output is clean.
Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 22:16:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT