W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Speaking of in-scope namespaces...

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:30:15 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2abryb4mg.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
|> Consider this pipeline:
|>
|> <p:pipeline>
|>   <p:input port="source">
|>     <p:inline>
|>        <doc xmlns="nonsuri" xmlns:a="nsauri" xmlns:b="nsburi" xmlns:c="nscuri">
|>          <content/>
|>        </doc>
|>     </p:inline>
|>   </p:input>
|>
|>   <p:identity>
|>     <p:input port="source" xmlns:xxx="nonsuri">
|>              select="xxx:doc/xxx:content"/>
|>   </p:identity>
|> </p:pipeline>
[...]
| which means the result of the above is
|
| <content xmlns="nonsuri" xmlns:a="nsauri" xmlns:b="nsburi"
| xmlns:c="nscuri" xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc"
| xmlns:xxx="nonsuri"/>

I think it'd be:

<content xmlns="nonsuri" xmlns:a="nsauri" xmlns:b="nsburi"
xmlns:c="nscuri" xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc"/>

I don't think the xxx namespace decl. is in scope.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Life does not cease to be funny when
http://nwalsh.com/            | people die anymore than it ceases to be
                              | serious when people laugh.--George
                              | Bernard Shaw

Received on Friday, 7 September 2007 20:30:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT