W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: label-elements proposal

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:54:08 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m24pi7jz0v.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
|> I actually really like Murray's suggestion of the "scheme" option because that
|> lets me add a "UUID" scheme and generate unique labels across documents.  I'd
|> be quite happy if we added a "UUID" scheme as an optional scheme in our
|> specification.
|
| I prefer not to go there

Right. I missed the "added a 'UUID' scheme" bit. Let's leave all schemes
except "decimal" as optional.

| all other value MUST be in a qname-but-not-ncname and is implementation defined

Yep.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We think in generalities, but we live
http://nwalsh.com/            | in detail--Alfred North Whitehead

Received on Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:54:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT