W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Unserializable documents

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:17:19 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m21wddqpbk.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say:
| The way I read this, this implies that an implementation is fine using
| SAX (or SAX++ to handle sequences) between components, without adding
| a whole lot of necessary processing of those SAX events between steps.
| So this is good.


| But shouldn't we specify what we mean by "namespace fixup" (maybe a
| reference to the XSLT specification?) and "other necessary
| adjustments"?

On reflection, I think namespace fixup is *all* we mean. I'll steal a
defn from XSLT, I think.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One of the great misfortunes of mankind
http://nwalsh.com/            | is that even his good qualities are
                              | sometimes useless to him, and that the
                              | art of employing and well directing
                              | them is often the latest fruit of his
                              | experience.-- Chamfort

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 12:17:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:44 UTC