Ignorable namespaces

• From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
• Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:30:11 +0100 (BST)
• To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20070903133011.4B40F2570C6@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk>

The algorithm for interpreting elements in section 3.8 reads (because
of its order) as if an user-declared step element can be in an
ignorable namespace, and its being a declared step type takes
priority.  Henry assures me this is not the case, and the definition
of ignorable element seems to agree.  Can we note this in the algrithm
itself?

-- Richard

Received on Monday, 3 September 2007 13:30:21 UTC