W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: XProc Minutes 27 Sep 2007

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:51:24 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0710030651m75a54522medd8f3f9f55043cb@mail.gmail.com>
To: jeni@jenitennison.com
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

Jeni,

Reading more of your concerns (Mike and You)

I propose to add a p:system-property
support-psvi which could be (true/false or yes/no) that would give the answer

By the way this implementation dependent thing is reported twice in A.1
[[
23. Whether or not the pipeline processor supports passing PSVI
annotations between steps is implementation-defined. See Section
7.2.3, "p:validate-with-xml-schema".
]]
and
[[
28. It is implementation-defined whether additional information items
and properties, particularly those made available in the PSVI, are
preserved between steps. See Section A.3, "Infoset Conformance".
]]

Any thoughts ?

Mohamed

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 13:51:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT