- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:39:51 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 10/3/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > |> And I think the answer then is yes. If the for-each doesn't have a > |> select expression, then the whole document, PIs, comments, and all > |> goes through. > | > | Thanks Norm, that's where I was going, so in this case, your proposal seems > | to propose different behavior for (NO @select) and for (@select="/") > | Is this intended ? > > No. Sorry. I think > > <p:for-each> > ... > > and > > <p:for-each select="/"> you mean <p:for-each> <p:iteration-source select="/"> ... </p:iteration-source> > ... > > are indistinguishable. The former selects all the documents that appear > on the input source; the second selects...all the documents that appear > on the input source. > Ok ! hope the verbing will be sufficienlty clear for that Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 12:40:02 UTC