- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:40:13 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 10/2/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | This means we will almost always have to use @except-prefixes='p' in > | p:namespace to avoid side effects, right ? > > How so? What's the harm in having the namespace for 'p' passed along? > > Also, how is this related to ignore-prefixes? You can't ignore the > XProc namespace... Nevermind, brain cramp I fear ! (that's contagious...) Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 15:40:22 UTC