W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Running a pipeline library (was Re: XProc Minutes 27 Sep 2007)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:43:03 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bmyv1offs.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

>   pipeline library
>
>    ->
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007Sep/0143.html
>
>    Norm: So the question is, if you hand a pipeline *library* to a processor
>    should it run a particular pipeline.
>    ... Seems to me that the implementation should take an option to specify
>    which library

....

>    Question: should we add a feature to establish the default pipeline in a
>    pipeline-library?
>
>    Y: 2; N: 6 (3 concur)
>
>    Norm: I don't see support for it. Anyone object to leaving it out of V1?
>
>    Murray wonders what Richard and Henry would have said. Norm does too, for
>    that matter.

I would have voted No.  I think it's worth adding some text pointing
out that implementations may provide a way for a user to run a named
pipe from a library.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHAjzckjnJixAXWBoRAoJRAJ4sEQjtNQbIlerzw5G3kbs3Mp2PawCffJFy
WIlTpB0gaEPEow/YC3j0kxw=
=ouwm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 12:43:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT