- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:43:03 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> pipeline library
>
> ->
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007Sep/0143.html
>
> Norm: So the question is, if you hand a pipeline *library* to a processor
> should it run a particular pipeline.
> ... Seems to me that the implementation should take an option to specify
> which library
....
> Question: should we add a feature to establish the default pipeline in a
> pipeline-library?
>
> Y: 2; N: 6 (3 concur)
>
> Norm: I don't see support for it. Anyone object to leaving it out of V1?
>
> Murray wonders what Richard and Henry would have said. Norm does too, for
> that matter.
I would have voted No. I think it's worth adding some text pointing
out that implementations may provide a way for a user to run a named
pipe from a library.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHAjzckjnJixAXWBoRAoJRAJ4sEQjtNQbIlerzw5G3kbs3Mp2PawCffJFy
WIlTpB0gaEPEow/YC3j0kxw=
=ouwm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 12:43:27 UTC