- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:12:24 +0200
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/21/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Yes, I think so. One could argue that the base URI of the document that > contains "b" is 'my-funky-document' and that the xml:base doesn't come > into effect until you get inside the root element. (The same would apply > to "d".) I think it makes sense to keep that distinction, and at least for implementations written in Java and using SAX this is relatively easy to do. But should we make this mandatory? Maybe this is a case where we will want to use a "may" or a "should". Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 07:12:29 UTC