- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:43:18 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
So please draft it, so we can advise if it is consistent or not I think that we choose to adopt $variable proposal on last telcon because there was no *obvious* inconsistency Mohamed On 5/11/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | Where have we said that option are accessible through $p:fooname notation ? > > Oops. We haven't. But we've agreed to it :-) > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The shortness of life can neither > http://nwalsh.com/ | dissuade us from its pleasures, nor > | console us for its pains.-- Vauvenargues > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 16:43:47 UTC