W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Fixed Windows use case

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 08:48:23 +0100
To: "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com>
Cc: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bd51bbvso.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I agree in principle with the suggestion that some grouping
functionality would be good.  I _think_ we actually discussed this a
while back wrt p:wrap.  The MT Pipeline wrap operation takes an option
which gives the functionality you want, which I make a lot of use of:

 <p:option name="groupBy" value="@attr"/>

The 'groupBy' option supplies an XPath, which is evaluated wrt the
context of the about-to-be-wrapped items, and ones with equal values
are grouped together.

I'd certainly support adding this in to our p:wrap component.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGQCtIkjnJixAXWBoRAn4yAJ4l9fHfmogIDA7g11aiTH+TzB0uKQCfbx+X
vB4yU23mULIUjHIAZfPm3tE=
=Ffpu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 07:48:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:51 GMT