- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 08:48:23 +0100
- To: "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Cc: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I agree in principle with the suggestion that some grouping
functionality would be good. I _think_ we actually discussed this a
while back wrt p:wrap. The MT Pipeline wrap operation takes an option
which gives the functionality you want, which I make a lot of use of:
<p:option name="groupBy" value="@attr"/>
The 'groupBy' option supplies an XPath, which is evaluated wrt the
context of the about-to-be-wrapped items, and ones with equal values
are grouped together.
I'd certainly support adding this in to our p:wrap component.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGQCtIkjnJixAXWBoRAn4yAJ4l9fHfmogIDA7g11aiTH+TzB0uKQCfbx+X
vB4yU23mULIUjHIAZfPm3tE=
=Ffpu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 07:48:26 UTC