Re: Optional options

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| So if I summarize we have at least 4 levels
|
| PARAMETER
|
| <p:xslt>
|  <p:parameter name="my:param" value="somevalue"/>
| </p:xslt>
|
| OPTION
|
| <p:xslt>
|  <p:option name="my:option" value="somevalue"/>
| </p:xslt>

We don't allow this today.

| SPECIAL ELEMENT
|
| <p:xslt>
|  <my:element value="somevalue"/>
| </p:xslt>
|
| SPECIAL ATTRIBUTE
|
| <p:xslt my:attribute="somevalue"/>
|
| Isn't that a little bit too much of Xtensibility ?

I don't think we want to forbid extension elements or attributes.
Parameters are open ended by design.

It may be that we don't want to allow random options in another
namespace.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Linux. Because rebooting is for
http://nwalsh.com/            | hardware upgrades.