W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Label and ID stuff

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:11:10 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0705050611i59f80f30pbdcd23137da0cad5@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 5/5/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
>
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | [[
> | A.1.8 Label Elements
> [...]
> | First, I was thinking that we could select trough an pattern
> | expression, which elements, I want to label (applying "*" if I really
> | want)
>
> Yes, I guess we could add a match pattern here.
>
> | Second, I don't really understand that limitation
> |
> | << If an existing xml:id value conflicts with a previously generated
> | value, the step fails. >>
> |
> | Does it mean that if, I have done a dummy implementation of XProc
> | which generate concat($prefix, '0', $suffix), and that there is more
> | than two element to label, I am allowed by the spec to fail !!!
>
> You are required by the spec to fail.



I clearly understand that. But the problem is that a conformant
implementation CAN rendre p:label unusable...(if I have concat($prefix, '0',
$suffix), I am still conformant)

Mohamed


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 13:11:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:51 GMT