Re: Example in 4.2 For-each

/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh writes:
|
|> No, I think you're right, except that the name of the port is #current.
|> Which isn't an NCName...grrr. I wonder if just plain "current" would
|> be better.
|
| Not in the current draft, it's not:
|
|   "The processor provides each document, one at a time, to the
|   subpipeline represented by the children of the p:for-each on a port
|   named current."

Brain cramp on my part. Nevermind :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | They that can give up essential liberty
http://nwalsh.com/            | to obtain a little temporary safety
                              | deserve neither liberty nor
                              | safety.--Benjamin Franklin