W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Example in 4.2 For-each

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 12:18:48 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87lkg5vq1j.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh writes:
|
|> No, I think you're right, except that the name of the port is #current.
|> Which isn't an NCName...grrr. I wonder if just plain "current" would
|> be better.
|
| Not in the current draft, it's not:
|
|   "The processor provides each document, one at a time, to the
|   subpipeline represented by the children of the p:for-each on a port
|   named current."

Brain cramp on my part. Nevermind :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | They that can give up essential liberty
http://nwalsh.com/            | to obtain a little temporary safety
                              | deserve neither liberty nor
                              | safety.--Benjamin Franklin

Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 16:18:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:51 GMT