- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 15:59:08 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> No, I think you're right, except that the name of the port is #current.
> Which isn't an NCName...grrr. I wonder if just plain "current" would
> be better.
Not in the current draft, it's not:
"The processor provides each document, one at a time, to the
subpipeline represented by the children of the p:for-each on a port
named current."
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGOfi8kjnJixAXWBoRApokAJ48lHr118djg4AppJBsWn+OposekACdFkIk
oDd+NeD6F7g8njiznHYL4G8=
=7ehV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 14:59:13 UTC