- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 10:32:09 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87647avuza.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| 3) No more parameter importing -- it likewise serves no purpose --
| all in-scope parameters are available to a step.
I think that's too radical.
What if I have a pipeline that invokes two stylesheets. Both understand
the "foo" parameter but I explicitly do not want it set on one of them.
| 4) But preventing parameter name clashes _is_ sometimes needed, so
| replace p:import-parameters with
|
| <p:parameters from-ns="...." to-ns="...."/>
I guess I could use this trick to work around it, but it seems really
tedious.
Better, I think, to make parameter passing to steps explicit.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Science is like sex: sometimes
http://nwalsh.com/ | something useful comes out, but that is
| not the reason we are doing
| it.--Richard Feynman
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 14:32:19 UTC