On 5/1/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > > > > On 4/30/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Sure but I think we should tag explicitely the step which could contain > > subpiplines, from the one who can't > > > > I don't quite follow. > > Right now the only things that can contain subpipelines are > our language constructs like p:choose, p:foreach, etc. > Ok, I just need such obvious thing to be written down in the spec And that for the moment, the user defined step cannot contain subpipelines I would be possible in the future but the user defined step should be tagged explicitely such that the XProc processor should be aware of that and don't flag it as errors Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 07:02:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT