W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Make p:http-request required?

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:38:11 -0700
Message-ID: <28d56ece0704301938v1f05ad4fx2edee009c7bc6c1d@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 4/30/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Unlike validation, XSLT 2.0, XQuery, and XSL FO processing, which all
> carry a fairly large implementation burden, p:http-request seems
> fairly lightweight. (I haven't implemented it yet, so I can still say
> this with a clear conscience :-)
> Furthermore, it seems like the sort of thing that could make for
> really interesting and useful pipelines. It'd be a shame if it wasn't
> interoperable.
> I propose that we move it to the "required" pile.

+ 1 to that!!!

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 02:38:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:42 UTC