W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Extension element

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:39:01 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0703282339m52cec1edodd7ce0028306cacd@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alessandro Vernet" <avernet@orbeon.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

My two cents

I don't like extension-prefixes, because we HAVE extension and we
don't want the processor to ignore them

Even if ignored-prefixes seems awkward, it is clearer for what it is
really used for

Mohamed

On 3/29/07, Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/24/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> > |  1) Are we calling it ignored-prefixes, or extension-prefixes?
> >
> > We're currently calling it ignored-prefixes, I think, though now that
> > we have p:doc, I think I'd be in favor of changing its name.
>
> +1 for changing the name.
>
> And for consistency, I would pick the same name we have in XSLT, and
> call this p:extension-element-prefixes.
>
> Alex
> --
> Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise
> http://www.orbeon.com/
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 06:39:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT