W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Required names?

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 07:13:17 +0100
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0703222313r32fc1f8dl58272a7f350d91a0@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

Ok

I fear it is too early for such a simplification

We have not for the moment a clear story on the naming of the pipeline
so for this one, I won't go that way for the moment

For the other, I want to be sure that in case of error handling, which
we haven't looked at it carefully yet, we won't mandate the presence
of identifiers....

So I'm inclined to say OK, but let's wait to see if we don't have
narrow case that would force us to go back on this later

Mohamed

On 3/22/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
> | Norman Walsh wrote:
> |> Now that we have a defaulting story, do we really want to require
> |> names on all our steps?
> |
> | No. They should be optional.
>
> I agree.
>
> Anyone opposed?
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> XML Standards Architect
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Friday, 23 March 2007 06:13:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT