W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Review of Spec

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:18:03 +0100
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0703150818v70e3f070pdb1bcf4daae96ce6@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 3/15/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> / ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
> | Norman Walsh writes:
> |
> |> |> * Why don't we use xs:boolean for boolean flags instead of "yes" and "no"
> |> |>  (e.g. the sequence attribute on p:input)?
> |> |
> |> | Hear hear!
> |>
> |> No. We don't use any XSD types anywhere else, why here? I don't plan
> |> to have an XSD-aware XProc pipeline processor.
> |
> | Understood -- the proposal is to allow true|false|0|1 instead of
> | yes|no
>
> /me shrugs.
>
> So you want to be consistent with XML Schema instead of XSLT? That
> seems an odd choice for XProc.

XML Schema instead of XSLT  ***and XML Prolog***
It is surely an odd choice

>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> XML Standards Architect
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 15:18:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT