W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:15:22 -0700
Message-ID: <4828ceec0703141815x18fa5962u941b6915b69fa332@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 3/14/07, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> That's a form of serialisation.  Not our problem.  Maybe a Note to the
> effect that serialisation may have to do namespace (and baseURI)
> fixup.

Are you saying that you are fine leaving this to the implementation
and having the example Alex gave in the first message of this thread
run fine on some implementations but fail with the error "namespace
for prefix 'm' is not declared"?

I would rather see this made explicit, one way or another, in the specification.

Alex
-- 
Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise
http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:15:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT