W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:06:12 +0000
To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bbqivyie3.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alex Milowski writes:

>
> The problem is that the  in-scope namespaces  has namespaces
> that aren't declared on that element.  As such, you need to fabricate
> the namespace declarations.  This is the difference between the
> [in-scope namespaces] property and the [namespace attributes]
> property of the element information item.

I still don't see your point.  The infoset has all the information the
pipeline needs.  Serialisation of such a document has work to do, but
that's always the case when sub-trees are serialised.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+A9kkjnJixAXWBoRAtj/AJ4o+MIb0K5icXo3KC6wV+sXCf2V4ACaA/3w
tB3o+51qvHlGJaWvbmOPcLw=
=uFqH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 15:07:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT