W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:21:58 +0000
To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bveh3ykft.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alex Milowski writes:

> The inline XSLT transformation won't compile unless the in-scope
> namespaces are copied to the document element supplied as part of
> the input to the 'transform' port of the XSLT step.

'copied'? 'document element'?  We've been clear from the beginning
that what flows down pipes is infosets.  The EII corresponding to
'<xsl:transform version="1.0">', which will become the document EII of
the infoset on the 'transform' port, has all the bindings it needs.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+AUGkjnJixAXWBoRAtwsAKCCgBFvIoFc6V74s+xJ6JuI3d2uFgCggvFE
g1q1FpCNWytnsttqliKSbsM=
=DnUS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 14:22:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT