W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:54:10 +0000
To: "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5blki0yra5.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Innovimax SARL writes:

> Because it should be positionned for ad hoc component
> <my:xslt p:ignore-prefixes="my">
> ...
> </my:xslt>

Yeah, I guessed something like that, but since 

 a) I'm opposed to user-defined compound steps in v.1 and
 b) it makes no sense on atomic steps

I think the confusion it will engender is much greater than any
possible benefit.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF9+JikjnJixAXWBoRAgLCAJ9MoickDfGcu7gsmsAuM5W0RLO9SACfb3z6
m6uuhdREUHdrwxsWfPRWlGw=
=YZzb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 11:54:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT