W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

5.7 Other steps

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:37:01 +0000
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5btzwoys2q.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm still unsure that blurring the distinction between language
constructs and atomic steps was a good idea.

In particular, I think 5.7 Other Steps is needlessly confusing,
because it tries to cover both atomic and compound steps.

I think the tableau should be split into two versions, one for atomic
steps and one for compound steps, with only the latter requiring a
discussion of the environment.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF995dkjnJixAXWBoRAjV/AJ9Gf2rMZxaziXrTowZE2XTw5J09EACeNzpL
67I3hQlujIpKdUXMcwErht0=
=ds8z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 11:37:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT