On 7/24/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | And what about > | > | http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc > | http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step > | http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-error > > Well, suppose we decide that XProc 2.0 is different enough from 1.0 > that we want to consider changing the namespace. If we've parked > ourselves at /ns/ then we have to use /ns/xproc2 or something. or just use version="2.0" I won't fight for that but it's always a pity to use google to remember the year of a spec... > > But, yes, /ns/ is the other obvious possibility. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Many ideas grow better when > http://nwalsh.com/ | transplanted to another mind than in > | the one where they sprang up.--Oliver > | Wendell Holmes > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 17:00:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT