W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 1 Comments

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:30:56 +0100
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87tzru5hkv.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
| Just a few editorial things.

I think I've addressed these.

| The first couple of paragraphs make it sound as if pipelines and steps can only
| have one input and one output, when in fact they can have several.
|
| In Example 1, "Result Document" is given as if it was the name of an output, but
| it isn't a legal output name because it has a space in it. Probably best to use
| a different term (eg just "result") just in case it gets people confused. In
| fact, it would be nice if the figure and the example code were consistent with
| each other in the names of the inputs and outputs (ie name the inputs 'source'
| and 'schemaDoc' in the figure).
|
| It might be useful to provide a full syntax version of one or both of the
| example pipelines in this section. They both currently use fairly heavy
| defaulting, which is fine if you want to indicate the simplicity of XProc but
| not so good for people just starting to understand it.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Nature is amoral, not immoral. [It]
http://nwalsh.com/            | existed for eons before we arrived,
                              | didn't know we were coming, and doesn't
                              | give a damn about us.--Stephen J. Gould

Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 09:15:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT