W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2007

XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.4 Comments

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:52:38 +0100
Message-ID: <46A48876.1020907@jenitennison.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

In the section on "Specified inline", the XSLT namespace is actually 
declared on the inline stylesheet. I wonder whether this might make 
people think that it *has* to be declared there (as if the inline 
document must be self-contained). Just moving it to the <p:xslt> element 
(or omitting it entirely, since the XProc namespace, necessary here, is 
also omitted) would at least prevent that confusion. (The same goes for 
the "Specified explicitly empty" section.)

I don't actually understand what the last paragraph in the "Specified 
inline" section means.

In "Specified explicitly empty", I think the Note about XPath is 
normative rather than informative and therefore shouldn't be a note.

Jeni Tennison
Received on Monday, 23 July 2007 10:52:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:43 UTC